Structured work orders
for O&M teams

Create, assign, and track work orders from inspection findings, platform alerts, and tasks added by your operations team

A defect list does not close the loop

Detecting a problem is only the start. Without a unified system, tasks from inspections, alerts, and field reports quickly scatter across tools, making it impossible to prioritize, assign, and track work effectively

Manual work planning

Analysis results and field reports still need to be turned into tasks manually, slowing down response.

No consistent prioritization

Without clear rules for assessing impact, it is hard to decide which tasks require immediate action.

Limited visibility into field work

Managers can’t clearly see what’s in progress, stuck, or already completed.

Disconnect between field and system

Repair documentation and field feedback often don’t make it back to a single source of truth.

How does it work?

How a problem becomes
a structured work order

One platform that connects the source of the problem,
the O&M team's work, and data updates in the system

ikona - 1

Problem detected or reported

The issue may come from an inspection, platform data analysis, or a report added by the team.

ikona - 2

Work order creation

The platform structures tasks, sets priorities, and creates work orders based on rules or operational decisions.

ikona - 3

O&M execution

Technicians receive the technical context, status information, and details they need to complete the work.

ikona - 4

System and component history update

Statuses, notes, and documentation flow back into the platform, updating the Digital Twin and component history.

A single environment for managing service orders

From priorities and work statuses to defect details and real-time platform data synchronization.

Work order and priority overview

Managers see statuses, deadlines, assignments, and progress in one place. Work orders can come from inspections, platform data, or tasks added by the operations team.

Full context of each work order

Each work order includes the problem description, defect list, deadline, assignee, and execution stage. Status updates, notes, and field documentation flow back into the platform, updating component history and the Digital Twin.

Field app for O&M teams

Technicians work on assigned work orders with
full technical context and real-time data synchronization.

aplikacja mobilna - solar spy

The mobile app gives them access to assigned tasks, problem locations, component history, and the ability to add photos and field documentation. It also works offline, synchronizing data once the connection is restored.

What O&M teams and operations managers get?

Less manual planning, faster work delegation, and better control across the portfolio.

Less manual work order planning

Instead of organizing tasks across several tools, the team works from one structure for actions and statuses.

More context for technicians

Every task includes the problem location, component history, and the context needed to complete the work.

Better progress visibility

Managers can see status and execution progress across the entire portfolio.

Consistent data after work completion

Notes and documentation do not get lost outside the system – they flow back into the platform.

Faster work assignment

Work orders can be assigned, updated, and tracked in one system.

Component history updates

Every field update improves the quality of asset data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are Solar Spy's organized work orders?

It’s a system for creating, assigning, and tracking work orders based on inspection results, platform monitoring signals, and tasks added manually by the operational team – all in one place, instead of scattered tools and lists.

Because a defect list only shows problems – it doesn’t tell you which ones need an immediate response, who’s responsible for them, or what stage the repair is at. Solar Spy combines data from inspections, monitoring, and O&M reports, prioritizes defects, and tracks work orders in one place, eliminating the chaos of working across multiple tools.

Four main ones: manual work list creation (analysis results have to be turned into tasks by hand, which slows the response), lack of consistent priorities (without clear rules it’s hard to tell what needs immediate action), poor field work visibility (the manager can’t clearly see what’s in progress, stuck, or already done), and a disconnect between the field and the system (repair documentation often doesn’t make it back to a single data source).

The process has four steps: detection or reporting of the problem (from an inspection, platform data analysis, or a report added by the team), work order creation (the platform sets priorities and builds the order based on rules or operational decisions), execution by the O&M team (the technician gets the technical context, statuses, and details), and system and component history update (statuses, notes, and documentation flow back into the platform).

Statuses, deadlines, assignments, and progress for all work orders in one place – regardless of whether the order came from an inspection, platform data, or a task added manually by the operational team.

A description of the problem, a list of related defects, a deadline, technician assignment, and the execution stage. Statuses, notes, and field documentation flow back into the platform, automatically updating the component history and the Digital Twin.

The mobile app gives the technician a list of assigned work orders, the location of problems on the farm map, component history and defect details, and the ability to add photos and documentation from the field. It also works offline, with data syncing automatically once the connection is restored.

Yes. Every change a technician makes in the field – a status update, a note, a photo, or documentation – flows back into the platform and strengthens the quality of the installation data, updating the component history and the Digital Twin.

Less manual planning (one structure for tasks and statuses instead of several tools), faster work delegation (assigning, updating, and tracking within a single system), better progress control across the whole portfolio, consistent data after work is completed (notes and documentation always flow back into the platform), and more context for technicians on every task.